Friday, November 19, 2004

The Post Spectacular Portable Audio

SoniqCast’sElement Aireo MP3 player with built-in WiFi
Posted May 25, 2004, 11:09 AM ET by Peter Rojas
Related entries: Portable Audio, Wireless



It sounds like we’ll be waiting a long, long time (maybe forever) for Apple to go wireless and add AirPort Extreme the iPod, but CNET has a review of the first and only MP3 player (so far) to come with built-in WiFi, the Element Aireo from SoniqCast. We’re not convinced that just being able to cut the cord is worth its $300 price tag or the fact that it only has a puny 1.5GB of storage (though this might actually be an advantage once you realize how long it’d take to transfer 20GB music over an 802.11b), but SoniqCast is promising a software upgrade for the Aireo that’ll let users wirelessly swap tunes with each other, which is something we’ve wanted to see for a long time.

Tuesday, November 09, 2004

The post-spectacular web

Applying Distributed XML to The Open Source Paradigm Shift
by Steve Mallett

http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/5530

Tim O'Reilly has written and spoken often on what he coins “The Open Source Paradigm Shift”. I've heard Tim give this speech a few times, and read it a few to boot. The one major point that sticks with me is that the software we “use” is no longer just on your desktop/laptop, but the software of the internet that we use everyday a la Google, eBay, Salesforce.com & Amazon to use his prime examples.

Tim goes on to point out that this software that exists only through our browsers or APIs, doesn't play by the same rules as does software that we download and use on our own machines. If I download the source code to the Apache HTTP server I can then compile it and use it in accordance to its open source license. This does not apply to a Google or an eBay. Even if you could download the code that runs Google you couldn't just stick it you home directory and start it up.... there's no value there. It's not the same thing at all. It's Infoware.

This is the point in Tim's speech that the brakes go on for me. For me open source is two things. One practical, the other touchy-feely. The first thing is that open source creates a practical benefit to me in that is works better. The other is the value of trust it gives me. The code is open, it can be forked at will when someone does something evil. Those two characteristics in combination make my wheels turn for open source software. So, what happens when the software I depend on slowly shifts to Infoware that I can never really touch and that while still immediately practical gives me no assurance that it can't be taken away or misused at will without any recourse available to me?

I think we can apply the same principles to the data as we have to the source code. Google, eBay, Amazon, et al. are really only as useful as we allow them to be through the information we give them. We still hold the cards here which means we have options.

My proposed solution is based on backlash at social network sites and some XML based projects I follow. Social networking sites, like friendster, orkut, etc, are really the ultimate in Infoware. There is no value whatsoever in the sites without the data we supply. In this case it is our network of acquaintances... our friends in XML.

When the first social networking site came out we all saw some value in it. It genuinely would be helpful to be able to reach out through people we know to find the perfect match for some need. Then came the copycats. “Are you my friend?” quickly became a joke and people tired
of giving up their info. At about the same time those who continued to like the idea of social networks devised a project named FOAF (Friend of a Friend). The concept here is that the owner of the data (that's you) creates one XML file containing your acquaintances (the info in 'Infoware') and distribute that as you like.

Another XML file based project I've been following is DOAP. Edd Dumbill wanted to apply the same idea as FOAF to Description of a Project. This is an XML file that contains all the info you'd ever want to know about a software project in one place that doesn't require being duplicated by hand in the handful of open source project sites.

Both of these projects are based on reducing the bother of an activity centered around the Infoware concept. But, there is a further use of following this model. We own and control the data. The info in Infoware is ours to dictate the terms of its use.

Let's apply this to an sample case. A good one is Google. You can and sometimes do tell Google to bug someone else. You do it with a robots.txt file on your webserver. For those unfamiliar Google looks for these in websites and if it says “Google, bugger off!” it does.

I could extend this model to an Amazon, or whomever challenges it (Amazone), with the data I provide it in terms of book reviews. Here I register as an Amazone user, tell it where it can find my bookreview.xml file and go my merry way knowing that if Amazone decides that if it wants to pull a fast one in the future I can change access to that information and give it to their competitor thus 'forking' them.

[This would have been an extemely useful feature this week with one of Friendster's employees being fired for blogging. We could have collectively pulled our network of friends in the blink of an eye, but as is, they 0wn J00!]

What led me to thinking about this are GPX files. These are GPS data files that describe GPS location co-ordinates. They are written in XML to insure interoperability of the data among GPS handhelds and software. There is another website that is basic Infoware: Geocaching.com It specializes in collecting and distributing information that it collects from users. They haven't done anything evil that I'm aware of, but they don't make GPX files freely available. People upload GPS information in a webform, the website turns it into a GPX file, and hides it behind a specialty 'service'. It does make the information available in a normal web page form, but this still seemed a bit weird to me and a first step towards begging to be forked. Plus, I'd like to make GPX forms from scratch. How do I make them distributable? Like DOAP and FOAF.

So let's apply my homemade GPX files to the Open Source Paradigm Shift. I create the valuable data, I tell those who are interested in it where it is under the condition that it is theirs as long as I choose to grant it to them. That's to say, conduct yourself as to make me want to continue to help make your Infoware useful.

In this model I believe that the freedom to innovate and improve data, as opposed to software code, is best served by being largely distributed and in the hands of the many.

There are some legal considerations here along the line of granting copyright of the information to one large organization to fight on one's behalf as the FSF encourages, and some attribution rights that people would want preserved. I think this could be best addressed with a very simple combination of the FSF copyright assignment and a creative common's attribution license. We'll leave that racket for another day.

This essay is available for further editing at mod_foo in the editorial queue. If you have anything to add or detract I'd love to see your editorial comments there as it goes to publication.

Steve Mallett is the founder and managing editor of OSDir.com, and mod_foo. His life can be found here in one light meaty snack.
Comment on this weblog
You must be logged in to the O'Reilly Network to post a comment.
Trackbacks appear below the discussion thread.
Post Comment
Trackbacks
Comments made on other sites via trackbacks appear below.

# Trackback from Marc's Voice
Entrance and Exit strategies - owning your own data
2004-09-12 14:14:05
OK - got to London, took care of family business and now I'm getting ready for tomorrow night by catching up with the blogosphere. One thread I've been watching carefully and with enthusiasm - is Jon Udell and Jeremy Zawodny talking about Flickr, Delicous and next generation web apps. I actually signed up to talk about this very subject for Web 2.0 - so I gotta get real nerdy - and boned up on the minutia. One thing I can say is "I agree!" In fact - "I wanna own my own data" was the title of the talks we...
# Trackback from shanti's daily links
Applying Distributed XML to The Open Source Paradigm Shift
2004-09-10 15:19:22
Applying Distributed XML to The Open Source Paradigm Shift...
# Trackback from The Silent Penguin
Giving our lives away
2004-09-09 07:19:56
Now that next generation web services such as Flicr and deli.cio.us are paving the way, what are the implications of these systems when applied to our personal lives? We're giving our life away. Ok, that's perhaps a bit drastic, but...

The post-spectacular phone

http://www.webcogs.com/the_future_of_phone_calls_is_now.aspx

Last updated 03/05/2004

Opinion Piece by Richard Lowe

I ‘Skyped’ somebody the other day, and you probably don’t know what I’m talking about (unless you already use Skype – in which case, skip along to the second but last paragraph, and my apologies).

Are you interested? Then read on.

Bear with me a moment, and I’ll explain – you’ll catch on later in this article. For years, the only way that you could communicate with somebody over miles of ground and air was the telephone. This worked, and it worked very well. It caused a revolution in communication, as the postal service had done in years gone by with the advent of postboxes, stamps and letters.

Later (much later) came the facsimile/fax – being able to ‘transport’ a written paper document to the other side of the world was impressive, at the time (centuries before the invention of the fax this would have been deemed as ‘witchcraft’).

Then, with the birth of the mobile phone, first as a ‘brick’ and then (as we know it now) a tiny device that fits comfortably into your pocket, communication between people many miles apart became truly portable for the first time in human evolution.

Of course the companies that owned the communications network that interconnected all of these phones and mobiles were the telephone companies. These telephone companies charged for every minute and second of human conversation, quite rightly-so – they needed to not only survive commercially, but make profit in order to be viable businesses. After all, they had a huge infrastructure of cables and telephone exchanges to support.

A number of years later, the Internet was born - another revolution of communication technology that (generally) wholly relied upon this telephone infrastructure to function and eventually become popular with the masses. Telephone companies were very quick to jump on the bandwagon and provide both businesses and consumers with a means to connect to the Net – again (generally), charging by the minute.

However, very quickly, it became not only a global database of knowledge populated by the thoughts, feelings and aspirations of the human race, but also a very effective medium for communication in the form of ‘E-Mail’ – it started to replace the original postal system. Not only between homes and businesses, but between desks in an office. Memos started to become a thing of the past.

Due to the subsequent competitiveness of the Internet Service Provider market (especially after the very dramatic dot com crash), the Internet very quickly became affordable to an awful lot of homes and businesses in the Western world at a fixed monthly cost, rather than on the traditional ‘pay per minute’ business model of the telephone world.

Furthermore, links to the Net from both people’s homes and businesses evolved rapidly from dial-up Modem connections to broadband with the wealth of multimedia and online application choices that this resulted in.

Let me usher you back to the present time.

Along comes VoIP (Voice over IP) – talking to other people over the Internet – using audio – just like a telephone conversation. This technology takes full advantage of the fact that there are many people in the western world that pay for their Internet connection on a fixed monthly fee basis.

VoIP allows you to make telephone calls to other VoIP users without having to ‘pay per minute’ via your telephone company. How? Because your voice is split into packets and routed, over the Internet.

Effectively (and to the despair of many telephone companies, I’m sure) it throws the old and let’s face it, defunct, telephone business model of ‘charging per minute’ on its head. The same telephone companies that were eager to take people’s money on a per minute basis, were just as quick to offer ‘fixed price per month’ Internet access. So we shouldn’t feel sorry for them – they must have seen it coming!

One of the leaders in this technology is a company by the name of ‘Skype’. They are, of course a commercial organisation, but have the foresight to realise that it is not at all trivial to take the droves of telephone/mobile phone-using people and bring them over to VoIP technology. Everybody likes their fixed and mobile numbers.

So they have the perfect solution – give away their Skype software for free. After all, other than a small number of Skype ‘directory’ servers (which store people’s contact details), the actual running costs of offering free voice calls over the Internet is effectively nothing since the calls are routed over the Net – at no cost to them. The clever bit is their software which gives better-than-phone-call quality, generally regardless of the speed of your link to the Net.

This type of technology has been around for a number of years now, but Skype are succeeding where other companies (including big names like Microsoft and Cisco) have failed. You’re probably wondering why. Well, other than the fact that you have a memorable ‘username’ rather than a telephone number, let me explain.

Ultimately, people want to talk. They don’t want to worry about NAT Firewalls, VPNs and all of the other technical issues that are associated with this type of technology. They just want to install the software and talk with either their friends or business associates. They just want things to work, even over a dial-up connection.

This is where Skype appear to be coming from as an offering. Their software is free, works behind NAT firewalls, VPNs and furthermore, they even offer a ‘Skype Phone’ which you can use to call other users rather than use a cumbersome headset/mic combo. It plugs into your USB port and looks like a traditional phone.

A headset/mic combo offers better sound quality (as it should), but we all need to be alerted when somebody is trying to call us, and their phone has a ringer. You can call somebody on the other side of the planet, and not pay a penny.

So what’s the catch, you’re probably asking yourself? There isn’t one. They are committed to users always making Skype calls free, providing that you just want to chat with one person at the other end.

If you want conference calls, video calls and voicemail, then quite rightly so, there will ultimately be a subscription charge in the future. For the record, conference calls are presently free at the time of writing this article (up to five people chatting, regardless of their geographical location).

That’s better than paying per minute, let’s face it. Ok, it’s not free as such, but you don’t pay a penny, as long as you’re hooked into the Net, which for most of us in the Western world is a fixed fee.

To summarise, if you’re the chairman of a very profitable Telephone company, you’ll probably have already clicked away from this article in disgust. But I lay down the gauntlet and ask you why didn’t you see this coming?

However, if, like me, you want to embrace the future of phoning people, or should I say, ‘Skyping People’ then just Google for ‘Skype’ and ask your friends to do so also.

And if you need further convincing, then let me tell you that you that Wi-Fi Skype phones that you can walk around your home or business with are just around the corner.

The future of telecommunications is now – out with the old, in with the new. But hey, that's progress.

Richard Lowe

Managing Director
Webcogs.

The Post Spectacular Healthy Carrier

Howard Rheingold sees a "new economic system" in the unconscious cooperation embodied by Google links and Amazon lists. BusinessWeek Online, Aug. 11, 2004

(sketches from the interview)

Where do you see the social revolution you've been talking about going next?
It's too early to say. The question is: What does it point toward? Some kind of collective action...in which the individuals aren't consciously cooperating. A market is a great example as a mechanism for determining price based on demand. People aren't saying, "I'm contributing to the market," [they say they're] just selling something. But it adds up.

Can you give me some specific examples of what you mean, beyond the market? Google is based on the emergent choices of people who link. Nobody is really thinking, "I'm now contributing to Google's page rank." What they're thinking is, "This link is something my readers would really be interested in." They're making an individual judgment that, in the aggregate, turns out to be a pretty good indicator of what's the best source. Then there's open source [software]. Steve Weber, a political economist at UC Berkeley, sees open source as an economic means of production that turns the free-rider problem to its advantage. All the people who use the resource but don't contribute to it just build up a larger user base. And if a very tiny percentage of them do anything at all -- like report a bug -- then those free riders suddenly become an asset.


post[spect] by ---gallizio

The post-spectacular celly

The everywhere phone

http://www.btplc.com/Innovation/Mobility/everywhere/

A mobile that works over the fixed network - mobility, flexibility, simplicity and...cheaper calls. BT is the first telecoms company to work on this unique application of modern technology to bring customers high quality on-the-move calls at a low cost.

It is simple. One phone that can be used anywhere - home, office or on-the-move in public Bluephone enables sites. It acts like a mobile but it has better reception, better voice quality and is cheaper to use than a mobile because it operates over BTs fixed line network.

A fantasy of the future? No, a reality for next year when the latest BT product - code-named Project Bluephone for now - is scheduled to launch.

It is a step into a different league of telecommunications - one which combines the best of state-of-the art communications technologies and yet offers the domestic or business customer greater simplicity and calls at a cost lower than current mobile calls.

Project Bluephone - the name was inspired by the Bluetooth wi-fi technology it uses - began in April 2003 and a public launch is pencilled in for April 2004. The 12-month development stage could be considered almost leisurely for the man who developed and launched BT Openzone in six months: John Lee.

World first

John, BTs wi-fi general manager Convergence, is heading up Project Bluephone and says, as far as he knows, BT is the only company in the world pursuing this technology combination for its customers.

"Bluephone is a BT-developed product and is the first in the world thats being done this way, although other people are playing with tariffs," he said. "It means you can use a mobile phone when in Bluephone-enabled sites - that could be in homes, offices or public places - and you make your call via your mobile phone over the fixed network rather than mobile network. This gives improved voice quality and improved coverage therefore very good reception over a low-cost, fixed network. Youll still get your mobile voice and data - SMS messages and voice mail - over fixed network.

"The user needs to be within range of a Bluephone-enabled site - home, office or maybe some public sites such as coffee shops - to have the call go across the PSTN network. When out of range, the handset will act as a standard mobile phone and send and receive calls over the GSM network. We are aiming for seamless roaming as the project progresses."

Currently, the project has undergone a successful trial at BT Centre in London and an invitation to tender for the network infrastructure technology - the widest BT has put out - has gone to 65 suppliers. To date it has received a large number of responses from around the world. A full business case will follow, leading to further internal and external trials.

Driving force

Theres a strong commercial driving force for BT to encourage mobile users back on to the fixed network. About 20 per cent of UK households dont have a fixed line - a decline over the last five or six years from a figure that neared 100 per cent at its peak. Research also shows that about 30 per cent of mobile calls are actually made from the users home.

"Even if people have a fixed line they are still making mobile calls from home," said John. "BT wants to maintain and grow its share of the fixed line and mobile revenues."

"The project is seen as being very strategic, putting BT back into the mobile market place, and increasing mobile customers and fixed revenues as well. Its also tied in to existing major business and consumer product development programmes within BT."

These are programmes such as mobility at home, a family-centred package, where a consumer customer can have up to five handsets on one contract. They get free calls up to two minutes long - a handy offering if the households children are calling home to be picked up, for instance.

Bluephone requires a handset containing specially developed software. The intention is that the customer will be able to choose from a variety of BT- or supplier-branded handsets, although some DECT ( Digital Enhanced Cordless Communications) products may be able to be used with the new service.

"We want to make this as cost-effective for the user as possible," said John. "For a reasonable initial outlay, it will be improving the quality of mobile calls, be easy to use and ultimately saving you money. We will be offering significant cost savings against todays mobile spend."

The Bluephone team is expecting sales to rocket as the nation catches on to the benefits.

Said John: "Erring on the conservative side, I predict thousands of Bluephones will be in use next year, and millions in year three. There are 27 million households with a BT line, so if each household buys just one handset, thats a lot of potential sales!"